- From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:54:42 -0400
- To: <public-sml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F9576E62032243419E097FED5F0E75F3062A1E89@USILMS12.ca.com>
In the 2008/09 set of documents: I did not have permission to access the following documents that were listed in the RDDL documents when dereferencing the preferred namespace URIs: http://www.w3.org/2008/11/sml-schema.xsd http://www.w3.org/2008/11/sml-if-schema.xsd The following URI provided on the sml-err.html (in the 2008/09) page did not resolve: http://www.w3.org/2008/12/sml-schema.xsd The sml-function.html refers to the SML-IF spec as the spec in which the sml-function namespace is defined; however, the N.B.-paragraph correctly identifies the source document as SML. Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. Research Staff Member, CA Labs 603 823-7146 (preferred) Cell: 603 991-8873 This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately. From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kumar Pandit Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:45 PM To: public-sml@w3.org Subject: action 210 : review of namespace documents I looked at the documents. All except the following look ok. n http://www.w3.org/2007/08/smlif o Text in the first paragraph should say SML-IF (instead of SML).
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 10:55:46 UTC