- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:41:48 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5561 Kirk Wilson <kirk.wilson@ca.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kirk.wilson@ca.com --- Comment #14 from Kirk Wilson <kirk.wilson@ca.com> 2009-03-22 14:41:48 --- The following are my comments - referencing the original comments. LKC1: Title should follow the style SML xxx Reference Style to be consistent with the SML spec. LKC7: The full title of section 2 should be restored. Simply entitling the section "Definition" and depending on the context for what the definition is of seems to be an inconvience to the reader. LKC8: I would vote against restructing section 2. Since it is relatively simple to define an SML XLink reference scheme (as opposed, e.g., to an EPR-based SML reference scheme), we should keep the structure as close as possible to that of the SML reference scheme definition. LKC14: The "active voice" modification is actually not "active voice", but an imperative: "Obtain a document. . ". This seems to be taking a step into the "algorithmic" form of expressing the defintion, which the WG has rejected--with VERY good reasons (IMHO). I agree with John that LKC19 (D has no value) is not irrelevant and LKC22 is correct as it stands ("or" vs. "and"). Good catch on the sml:targetType. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2009 14:56:55 UTC