- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:32:02 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5561
Virginia Smith <virginia.smith@hp.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|cmsmcq@w3.org |len.charest@microsoft.com
--- Comment #13 from Virginia Smith <virginia.smith@hp.com> 2009-03-20 22:32:01 ---
The following are my comments on the [style] comments - referencing original
comments from attachment in Comment #10 of Bug 5561:
title - name should match SML spec which would be "SML XLink Reference Scheme".
link style comments - In the SML and SML-IF specs, the convention is
'generally' (meaning I don't think we did a thorough check to make sure we were
strict about this) to use [] when the link is parenthetical to the sentence and
not use [] when the text is part of the sentence. There are exceptions (such as
for Schema elements). However, I think that we should maintain this convention.
Definition section - the subsections should match SML spec 4.3 as much as
possible.
Notes - the SML and SML-IF spec show the 'Note' as separate from the actual
note content. This is governed by a W3C stylesheet and I prefer to see
consistency with the specs. In other words, the "Note" is separate from the
paragraph as originally written.
LKC12 - I disagree (agree with John's comment)
LKC17 - I disagree and prefer 'if'
LKC19 - I prefer to keep the text.
LKC25 - I recommend just adding 'valid' to paragraph 3.0.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 22:32:11 UTC