See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribenick: Kirk
<scribe> Scribe: Kirk Wilson
<johnarwe_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009May/att-0012/20090518-sml-minutes.html
Minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009May/att-0012/20090518-sml-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: Approved by unanimous consent.
No new Action items
Len: comments are basically editorial
Kirk: Agrees and is working on them. Still needs to look into the hover problem on "Back to Contents" link.
RESOLUTION: Consensus that there is no need to review the document once the changes are made.
Len: New version is ready to be posted to answer the comment raised by Kirk.
Len: Also need to change the wording for the XML reference to match that which in the SML spec.
Kirk: One minor wording change needs to be made: "this specification" --> "SML specification".
Len: Question on wording in
section 2 item 4.
... Are we erroring on side of terseness rather than
understandability?
<lencharest> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2007/xml/sml/xlink-note.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1
John: SML references RFC 3986; but XML Schema spec references the predecessor.
<lencharest> Propose changing "as described in the applicable URI RFC" to "as described in the applicable RFC for URI generic syntax".
John: Any objections to proposing the wording in the XLink note.
RESOLUTION: No objections to proposal
John: Recommends that Len talk to Kumar about the change.
Len: Three changes to XLink note: (1) Issue reported by Kirk, (2) change XML reference text, (3) preceding wording proposal.
John: Any objection to accepting the XLink note with these changes.
RESOLUTION: No objections.
Len: Question: What should be the date on the Notes?
Henry: Use the date of a week from this Thursday -- 11 June 2009
John: Kumar has been submitting
these. Len should check with Kumar if he will be available to
submit the document.
... Otherwise, Len will have to learn the process or wait until
Kumar has returned.
Henry: Date can be in the past by a couple of days (2 or 3 days).
Len and Kirk agree to make the date on the notes 11 June 2009.
John: We don't have a queue of
work. Normal practice is for WG is to remain in existence for
about 6 months. We would stay in existence until around
Thanksgiving.
... One strategy is to schedule call, but cancel if nothing has
come in; or lessen frequency of calls.
... Will not be available during July; in his absence, Henry
will run the meeting.
... Team should consider these ideas for next Monday.
Kirk expresses regrets for next Monday. He will email his comments.
Adjournment: 1:05 pm ET.
Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending 2008-05-22 Lynn, James Until further notice 2009-01-08 Smith, Virginia First half of Mondays (probably scribe-exempt) 2009-01-15 Gao, Sandy Second half of Mondays (probably scribe-exempt) 2009-05-11 Pandit, Kumar 2008-05-18 Charest, Len 2009-06-01 Wilson, Kirk 06/08 Exempt Arwe, John Exempt Henry Thompson