- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:01:24 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5390
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cmsmcq@w3.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords|needsAgreement |resolved
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@w3.org> 2009-01-08 20:01:24 ---
We discussed this issue during the call of 8 January 2009.
Kirk Wilson suggested that the EPR Note should simply say that if
EPR references are used in locators for non-embedded documents in an
SML-IF package, then the same issues arise as when EPRs are used as a
reference scheme -- that is to say, it's complicated and error prone,
and those who do it need to make sure they know what they're doing.
KW noted that the draft text of the EPR Note already says this.
Those on the call agreed that this proposal suffices as a resolution
of the issue, and that the bug should be marked as FIXED.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2009 20:01:32 UTC