Fw: [w3c sml] 2009-08-24 meeting

Apparently the server gods missed Len and are still annoyed with him about 
his recent vacation, so his posts to public-sml are bouncing like dime 
store Super-balls.  In his stead:

Best Regards, John

TACCT: Simplicity is ultimate sophistication 
                                        -- Leonardo da Vinci
Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787
----- Forwarded by John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM on 08/24/2009 04:07 PM -----

From:
Len Charest <lcharest@microsoft.com>
To:
John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
Date:
08/24/2009 02:54 PM
Subject:
RE: [w3c sml] 2009-08-24 meeting



FYI, I’m currently unable to check out files from the CVS repository at 
dev.w3.org. I’ve asked the webmaster for help.
 
-Len
 
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of John Arwe
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 5:13 AM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: [w3c sml] 2009-08-24 meeting 
 

Len: The SML working group is still awaiting a response from Len on 
whether or not he wishes to make the XLink updates discussed at our last 
meeting.  Please indicate your intent to either make the updates yourself 
or relinquish the "XLink pen" to the other remaining editor. 
All: The Schema working group requests SML's feedback on their response to 
bug 5163, as of Friday night.  If you object to their response, please 
post your objections this week.  
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5163  fwiw, since I have 
historically been "minding" SML's comments on Schema 1.1, I have read the 
draft diff at 
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b5163.html#composition 
and am satisfied that it addresses the problem cited in the bug. 
All: Ginny has posted minutes of the previous meeting.  If anyone knows of 
any changes needed, or has any objections to approving them as a true 
record of that meeting, kindly post those changes/objections this week. 
Since I see little value in spending people's time on the first item, no 
one really has had time to prepare for the second, and all of them seem 
quite amenable to email, we will cancel today's meeting.  Where feedback 
has been requested, if no changes/objections are posted this week (end of 
day Friday, ET), I will treat that as implicit agreement (5163 response 
ok, minutes approved, respectively) and proceed accordingly.   
If we have responses on all of the items above this week, and no new 
urgent business arises, I anticipate that we will cancel next week's 
meeting as well.  Keep in mind that the week after (2 weeks from today) is 
a US Holiday, so that meeting will also likely not take place (absent our 
US members, Henry would get lonely and have no quorum anyway).  If that is 
how things play out, "see" you all on Sept 14. 

Best Regards, John

TACCT: Simplicity is ultimate sophistication 
                                       -- Leonardo da Vinci
Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787