- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:01:08 -0400
- To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Cc: public-sml@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 13:01:52 UTC
> What does it mean for a processor to 'support' both 4e and 5e? That > it both rejects and does not reject a document with 5e-only names? I believe the presumption was that unspecified mechanisms (content sniffing, run time options being two examples) would be used to select the set of rules actually employed at run time. To paraphrase using Schema language since SML lacks precise equivalent terms, a given SML assessment episode would use either 4e rules or 5e rules. This is analogous to the Schema 1.1 language around using 1.0 vs 1.1 for XML and XML Namespaces, as I understand it. Best Regards, John TACCT: Simplicity is ultimate sophistication -- Leonardo da Vinci Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601 Voice: 1+845-435-9470 Fax: 1+845-432-9787
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 13:01:52 UTC