Re: References to XML in SML specs

thanks for the good news Henry.
Assuming the working group is still satisfied with this resolution, which 
seems likely given past discussions, I think this means that in order to 
proceed to Rec the following needs to occur.  Have I missed anything?
(1) the wg needs to establish a proposed publication date
(2) the editors need to prepare a draft containing this change and that 
satisfies the Rec pubrules, and create a list of important changes since 
last transition (the References change might be the only one, and a bug 
needs to be entered for it)
(3) the chair and/or Team Contact need to draft a transition request
(4) the Team Contact needs to schedule a transition call with the Director
(5) the Team Contact ensures a public comment mailing list is available 
(any reason not to use public-sml?)
(6) wg members need to figure out what form of publicity they want and 
coordinate that with w3c Comm Team

(ref: transition steps "to Rec" 
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl&docstatus=rec-tr 
)

Best Regards, John

TACCT: Simplicity is ultimate sophistication 
                                        -- Leonardo da Vinci
Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787



From:
ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
To:
public-sml@w3.org
Date:
04/03/2009 09:44 AM
Subject:
Re: References to XML in SML specs
Sent by:
public-sml-request@w3.org



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

ht writes:

> I suggest we revise the bibliography entry for XML 1.0 in SML and
> SML-IF as follows:
>
>   Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition), T. Bray,
>   J. Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, and E. Maler, Editors. World Wide
>   Web Consortium, 10 February 1998, revised 16 August 2006. This
>   edition of the XML 1.0 Recommendation
>   (http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816) was the one current at
>   the time this document went to Candidate Recommendation.  The latest
>   version of XML 1.0 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/.
>   Implementations may follow the edition cited or any later
>   edition(s); it is implementation-defined which.
>
> I have queried the reviewer as to whether he would be happy with this.

He has now replied: "That's fine"

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged 
spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ1hKCkjnJixAXWBoRAp7+AJ0Sldv5JLLJaCv4IgCUz7jz+46wkACdHxe5
dp8iM36yE7GgSk6+So8MMuU=
=du12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----