[Bug 6237] New: is SMLIF locator/documentURI content a URI reference?


           Summary: is SMLIF locator/documentURI content a URI reference?
           Product: SML
           Version: LC
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Interchange Format
        AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
        ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com
         QAContact: public-sml@w3.org

In a nutshell, this boils down to whether relative references are allowed, and
whether support for them is required.

I can find nothing in the LC2 draft answering this question definitively,
although I suspect the working group's intent was that the content was a URI
reference (i.e. relative URIs are allowed, and support for them is required).

The working group might also consider making explicit the contextual
expectation that the content of documentURI is usually a URL (a subset of all

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 16:04:56 UTC