Saturday, 31 May 2008
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
Thursday, 29 May 2008
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
Wednesday, 28 May 2008
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
- [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
- [Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same".
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-29 SML Telecon
Tuesday, 27 May 2008
Friday, 23 May 2008
- [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor'
- [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation.
Thursday, 22 May 2008
- [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E
- [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E
- [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
- [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string
- [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
- [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value
- [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
- [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute
- [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E
- [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation.
- [Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same".
- [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions
- [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft
- [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E
- [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation.
- [Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same".
- [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute
- RE: [w3c sml] sml:ref and interoperability
- [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- [w3c sml] sml:ref and interoperability
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string
Tuesday, 20 May 2008
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-20 SML Telecon
- [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
Friday, 16 May 2008
- [Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long
- [Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line
- [Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-15 SML Teleconference
Thursday, 15 May 2008
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary
- [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean?
- [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI
- [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] v2 2008-05-15 SML Telecon
- [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary
- [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean?
- [Bug 5525] Confusing section names
- [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI
- [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value
- bugs in "surprising" (to me) states
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
Wednesday, 14 May 2008
Thursday, 8 May 2008
- Re: 5679 fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
- RE: 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- Re: 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft
- [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
- [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value
- [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
- Re: 5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
- RE: 5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- RE: 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- 5679 fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
- 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- 5659 schemaComplete default value
- 5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
- [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
Wednesday, 7 May 2008
- [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
- [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft
- RE: interoperability is... ? (was: SML interop test plan)
- regrets for 5/8 and 5/15
- [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft
Monday, 5 May 2008
- Re: [w3c sml] [EPR Note] Response to Comment #9, Issue 5431
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-01 SML Teleconference
- Re: [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
- RE: SML interop test plan
Saturday, 3 May 2008
Thursday, 1 May 2008
- Re: discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF
- [Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently
- [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes
- [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- Re: [w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-05-01 SML Telecon
- Re: discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
- support for shorthand (barename) pointers : summary of discussion at f2f