Monday, 30 June 2008
Wednesday, 25 June 2008
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
- [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
- [Bug 5637] inconsistencies in language for rule attachment to schema components
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output
- [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
- [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary
- [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary
- [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean?
- [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean?
- [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
- [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents
- [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output
- [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
Tuesday, 24 June 2008
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output
- [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents
- [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output
- 5680 fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
- [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up
- [Bug 5797] New: SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified
- [Bug 5740] Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted
- [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C
- [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5790] New: reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents
- [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently
- [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes
- [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes
- [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree
- [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string
- [Bug 5788] New: target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output
Monday, 23 June 2008
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- Your comments on SML LC
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
Friday, 20 June 2008
Thursday, 19 June 2008
- [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation.
- [Bug 5761] Change to rfc 2119 keywords
- [Bug 5638] fix consistency of language for schematron constraints
- [Bug 5767] Define "SML constraints"
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
- [Bug 5638] fix consistency of language for schematron constraints
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
- [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
- [Bug 5761] Change to rfc 2119 keywords
- [Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology
- [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor'
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation.
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
- [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
Wednesday, 18 June 2008
- [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
- [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
- [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
- [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up
- [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently
- [Bug 5740] Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-06-23 to 208-06-25 SML Face to Face
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-06-18 SML telecon
- [Bug 5761] Change to rfc 2119 keywords
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
- [Bug 5767] New: Define "SML constraints"
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
Monday, 16 June 2008
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-06-12 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5761] New: Change to rfc 2119 keywords
- [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor'
- [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor'
- [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree
- [Bug 5760] New: definitions and uses of "target" disagree
- [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions
- [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation.
- [Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
Friday, 13 June 2008
Thursday, 12 June 2008
- [Bug 5741] New: 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology
- [Bug 5740] New: Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted
- [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
- [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
- [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-06-12 SML Telecon
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
Wednesday, 11 June 2008
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
- [Bug 5532] The previous-draft links are out of date
- [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor'
- [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor'