public-sml@w3.org from December 2008 by date

Saturday, 27 December 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-12-18 SML Telecon Len Charest

Sunday, 21 December 2008

• [Bug 6328] New: Misprint in example in SML-IF, 4.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 18 December 2008

• [Bug 6321] New: clarify schema validation behavior when an IF instance contains zero schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• action 209 and namespace documents for the SML namespaces C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• 5680 draft John Arwe
• RE: v4 of test cases spreadsheet Len Charest
• CVS directories for test cases Len Charest

Tuesday, 16 December 2008

• sample draft impl reports John Arwe
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-12-18 SML John Arwe

Friday, 12 December 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-12-11 SML Telecon Wilson, Kirk D

Thursday, 11 December 2008

• EPR and XLink tech notes in CVS Len Charest
• v4 of test cases spreadsheet Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

Tuesday, 9 December 2008

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-12-11 SML John Arwe

Monday, 8 December 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-12-04 SML Telecon Len Charest

Thursday, 4 December 2008

• [Bug 6245] SML locid example request from ITS Interest Group bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6245] SML locid example request from ITS Interest Group bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 2 December 2008

• [Bug 6205] add conformance statement for model processors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5902] sml:nilref and PSVI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5924] Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5925] Schema used to assess instance validity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5637] inconsistencies in language for rule attachment to schema components bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4633] Use of short namespace bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5599] use of sml:acyclic bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5600] request for additional examples bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-12-04 SML telecon John Arwe
• [Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 1 December 2008

• [Bug 6260] New: roll up CR changes made during publication process bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Last message date: Saturday, 27 December 2008 22:09:48 UTC