public-sml@w3.org from August 2008 by date

Friday, 29 August 2008

• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS David Whiteman
• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS John Arwe
• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS David Whiteman
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS David Whiteman
• SML 1.1 last call draft ready, requesting response from you on August bare name consensus John Arwe
• [Bug 5998] New: second LC draft publication related editorial changes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5600] request for additional examples bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 28 August 2008

• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• bug 5741 draft John Arwe
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5600] request for additional examples bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS David Whiteman
• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS David Whiteman
• 5600 request for additional examples Kumar Pandit
• RE: Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS Kumar Pandit

Wednesday, 27 August 2008

• RE: proposed fix for 5741 Sandy Gao
• Schema files for current draft for use by COSMOS David Whiteman
• RE: proposed fix for 5741 Kumar Pandit
• RE: proposed fix for 5741 Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

Tuesday, 26 August 2008

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-08-28 SML John Arwe
• proposed fix for 5741 Kumar Pandit

Monday, 25 August 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-08-21 Teleconf minutes Wilson, Kirk D

Friday, 22 August 2008

• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5980] New: SML The responsibility division between 4.3.1 and 4.3.1.1 are not very clear. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 21 August 2008

• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: proposal text for 5741 John Arwe
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 20 August 2008

• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: proposal text for 5741 Kumar Pandit
• Re: proposal text for 5741 John Arwe
• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified Wilson, Kirk D
• RE: [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified Kumar Pandit
• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

• RE: [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified Wilson, Kirk D
• RE: [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified Wilson, Kirk D
• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 18 August 2008

• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Saturday, 16 August 2008

• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 15 August 2008

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-08-21 SML Pratul Dublish
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• CFP: Mashups'08 - Second International Workshop on Web APIs and Services Mashups at ICSOC'08 Nirmit Desai

Thursday, 14 August 2008

• [Bug 5923] Requirements on schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-08-14 SML Telecon Sandy Gao
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5925] Schema used to assess instance validity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5924] Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5923] Requirements on schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5902] sml:nilref and PSVI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5925] Schema used to assess instance validity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5924] Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5923] Requirements on schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5902] sml:nilref and PSVI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 13 August 2008

• [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5925] Schema used to assess instance validity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5902] sml:nilref and PSVI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5924] Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5923] Requirements on schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5924] Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [w3c sml] Bug 5922 resolution - please review John Arwe
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5925] Schema used to assess instance validity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 12 August 2008

• [Bug 5923] Requirements on schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5908] Contradiction around schemaBinding bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5902] sml:nilref and PSVI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: [w3c sml] Bug 5922 resolution - please review Wilson, Kirk D
• [w3c sml] Bug 5922 resolution - please review Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-08-14 SML Telecon John Arwe
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-08-07 SML telecon Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

Thursday, 7 August 2008

• [Bug 5925] Schema used to assess instance validity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5924] Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5923] Requirements on schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5908] Contradiction around schemaBinding bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5902] sml:nilref and PSVI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• 5543 SML URI seems overconstrained Kumar Pandit
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-08-07 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish

Tuesday, 5 August 2008

• RE: Schematron 1.5 namespace in SML 1.1 specification David Whiteman
• RE: Schematron 1.5 namespace in SML 1.1 specification Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• Schematron 1.5 namespace in SML 1.1 specification David Whiteman
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-07-31 SML conf call Kumar Pandit
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 1 August 2008

• Update on Schematron validator Wilson, Kirk D

Last message date: Friday, 29 August 2008 21:10:11 UTC