Wednesday, 30 April 2008
Tuesday, 29 April 2008
- RFC 2557 & SML-IF
- [w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-05-01 SML Telecon
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-04-24 SML Teleconference
Thursday, 24 April 2008
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1
- [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-04-24 SML Telecon
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-04-17 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note
- [w3c sml] [EPR Note] Response to Comment #9, Issue 5431
- [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
- [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-24 SML Telecon
- [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
- [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently
- RE: draft response on bug 5562
Wednesday, 23 April 2008
- RE: draft response on bug 5562
- Regrets for tomorrow - 4/24
- [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- CFP: Mashups'08 @ ICSOC
Tuesday, 22 April 2008
- draft response on bug 5562
- [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes
- [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up
Sunday, 20 April 2008
Friday, 18 April 2008
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1
- [Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions
- [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
- [Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional?
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
Thursday, 17 April 2008
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
- [Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec
- [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-17 SML telecon agenda
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-17 SML telecon agenda
- RE: SML interop test plan
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
- [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean?
- [Bug 5587] Redundant text "interchange set"
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line
- Fw: [w3c sml][agenda][ver 2] 2008-04-17 SML telecon agenda
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-04-10 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary
- [Bug 5580] re-define SML URI scheme in terms of xs:anyURI type
- [Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional?
- [Bug 5525] Confusing section names
- [Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored
- RE: SML interop test plan
- [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI
- [Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors
- [Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec
- RE: SML interop test plan
Tuesday, 15 April 2008
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-17 SML telecon agenda
- RE: SML interop test plan
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-17 SML telecon agenda
Monday, 14 April 2008
Friday, 11 April 2008
Thursday, 10 April 2008
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5637] inconsistencies in language for rule attachment to schema components
- [Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note
- [w3c sml] [EPR Note] New draft
- [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized
- [Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI
- [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean?
- [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI
- [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions
- [Bug 5638] fix consistency of language for schematron constraints
- [Bug 5637] inconsistencies in language for rule attachment to schema components
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs?
- [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
- [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
Wednesday, 9 April 2008
Tuesday, 8 April 2008
- [Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings
- [Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
Saturday, 5 April 2008
Friday, 4 April 2008
- [Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions
- [Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF
- [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
- [Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
- [Bug 5600] request for additional examples
- [Bug 5600] request for additional examples
- [Bug 5600] request for additional examples
- [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
- [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function
- [Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
- [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
- [Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional?
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
- [Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document
- [Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document
- [Bug 5580] re-define SML URI scheme in terms of xs:anyURI type
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5599] use of sml:acyclic
- [Bug 5599] use of sml:acyclic
- [Bug 5599] use of sml:acyclic
- [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
- [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557
- [Bug 5587] Redundant text "interchange set"
- [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution