- From: Valentina Popescu <popescu@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:06 -0400
- To: "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Cc: bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org, public-sml@w3.org, public-sml-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFC0920162.A548AD56-ON85257384.0050F8C2-85257384.00513CB0@ca.ibm.com>
Kirk,
This bug is only dealing with the EPR 2.2 description text so I tried to
not make updates outside the scope of this request.
Your question must be addressed under
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4637
Thank you,
Valentina Popescu
IBM Toronto Labs
Phone: (905)413-2412 (tie-line 969)
Fax: (905) 413-4850
"Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org
10/30/2007 07:13 AM
To
<bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>, <public-sml@w3.org>
cc
Subject
RE: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
I'm sorry, but I'm totally bewildered by this example. Would someone
please explain it to me before I comment on it in Bugzilla.
How does the example point to the PHY101 course?
The wsa:Address element is mapped to a wsa:To element in a SOAP Header.
What is the SOAP Body supposed to be?
What's the purpose of the "u" namespace declaration?
Thanks.
Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Research Staff Member
CA Labs
603 823-7146
-----Original Message-----
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:29 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5106
popescu@ca.ibm.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Comment #1 from popescu@ca.ibm.com 2007-10-29 20:29 -------
The current content has been slightly changed since the bug has been
opened.
Current content for section 4.2.2 :
4.2.2 EPR Scheme
The EPR reference scheme MUST be implemented by using an instance of the
wsa:EndpointReference global element declaration [WS-Addressing Core] as
a
child element of the SML reference element. Instances of the EPR
reference
scheme MUST NOT be interpreted as inter-document references in the
context of
an SML-IF document.
The following example illustrates how the EnrolledCourse reference that
references course PHY101 in MIT university can be represented using the
EPR
scheme:
[Example Under Construction]
<EnrolledCourse xmlns="http://www.university.example.org/ns"
sml:ref="true">
<wsa:EndpointReference
xmlns:u="http://www.university.example.org/schema">
<wsa:Address>http://www.university.example.org</wsa:Address>
</wsa:EndpointReference>
</EnrolledCourse>
Changed to :
The EPR reference scheme MUST be implemented by using an instance of the
wsa:EndpointReference global element declaration [WS-Addressing Core] as
a
child element of the SML reference element.
The following example illustrates how the EnrolledCourse reference that
references course PHY101 in MIT university can be represented using the
EPR
scheme:
<EnrolledCourse xmlns="http://www.university.example.org/ns"
sml:ref="true">
<wsa:EndpointReference
xmlns:u="http://www.university.example.org/schema">
<wsa:Address>http://www.university.example.org</wsa:Address>
</wsa:EndpointReference>
</EnrolledCourse>
What changed :
1.Removed : Instances of the EPR reference scheme MUST NOT be
interpreted as
inter-document references in the context of an SML-IF document. ( this
is
already in IF; SML should not refer to IF )
2. Removed: [Example Under Construction] ( you proposed to change it
with Valid
example but I feel this is redundant with the paragraph above )
3. Replaced :
....as a child element of the SML reference element.
with ...as a child of the SML reference element.
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 14:47:35 UTC