- From: Valentina Popescu <popescu@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:06 -0400
- To: "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Cc: bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org, public-sml@w3.org, public-sml-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFC0920162.A548AD56-ON85257384.0050F8C2-85257384.00513CB0@ca.ibm.com>
Kirk, This bug is only dealing with the EPR 2.2 description text so I tried to not make updates outside the scope of this request. Your question must be addressed under http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4637 Thank you, Valentina Popescu IBM Toronto Labs Phone: (905)413-2412 (tie-line 969) Fax: (905) 413-4850 "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com> Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org 10/30/2007 07:13 AM To <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>, <public-sml@w3.org> cc Subject RE: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme I'm sorry, but I'm totally bewildered by this example. Would someone please explain it to me before I comment on it in Bugzilla. How does the example point to the PHY101 course? The wsa:Address element is mapped to a wsa:To element in a SOAP Header. What is the SOAP Body supposed to be? What's the purpose of the "u" namespace declaration? Thanks. Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. Research Staff Member CA Labs 603 823-7146 -----Original Message----- From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:29 PM To: public-sml@w3.org Subject: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5106 popescu@ca.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #1 from popescu@ca.ibm.com 2007-10-29 20:29 ------- The current content has been slightly changed since the bug has been opened. Current content for section 4.2.2 : 4.2.2 EPR Scheme The EPR reference scheme MUST be implemented by using an instance of the wsa:EndpointReference global element declaration [WS-Addressing Core] as a child element of the SML reference element. Instances of the EPR reference scheme MUST NOT be interpreted as inter-document references in the context of an SML-IF document. The following example illustrates how the EnrolledCourse reference that references course PHY101 in MIT university can be represented using the EPR scheme: [Example Under Construction] <EnrolledCourse xmlns="http://www.university.example.org/ns" sml:ref="true"> <wsa:EndpointReference xmlns:u="http://www.university.example.org/schema"> <wsa:Address>http://www.university.example.org</wsa:Address> </wsa:EndpointReference> </EnrolledCourse> Changed to : The EPR reference scheme MUST be implemented by using an instance of the wsa:EndpointReference global element declaration [WS-Addressing Core] as a child element of the SML reference element. The following example illustrates how the EnrolledCourse reference that references course PHY101 in MIT university can be represented using the EPR scheme: <EnrolledCourse xmlns="http://www.university.example.org/ns" sml:ref="true"> <wsa:EndpointReference xmlns:u="http://www.university.example.org/schema"> <wsa:Address>http://www.university.example.org</wsa:Address> </wsa:EndpointReference> </EnrolledCourse> What changed : 1.Removed : Instances of the EPR reference scheme MUST NOT be interpreted as inter-document references in the context of an SML-IF document. ( this is already in IF; SML should not refer to IF ) 2. Removed: [Example Under Construction] ( you proposed to change it with Valid example but I feel this is redundant with the paragraph above ) 3. Replaced : ....as a child element of the SML reference element. with ...as a child of the SML reference element.
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 14:47:35 UTC