- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:46:57 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5040 ------- Comment #2 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2007-10-25 16:46 ------- The reference proposal covers part of the question raised by this bug, but not all. The remaining question is: If an SML reference is unresolved (that is, sml:ref="true", sml:nilref="false", no target), then - Should targetElement be satisfied or violated - Should targetType be satisfied or violated For completeness, what we did decide: Acyclic targetRequired targetElement targetType Non-reference Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Null Satisfied Violated Satisfied Satisfied Unresolved Satisfied Violated ? ? Resolved Check Satisfied Check Check
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:47:05 UTC