[Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\" from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2007-10-16 (public-sml@w3.org from October 2007)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:22:55 +0000
To: public-sml@w3.org
CC:
Message-Id: <E1IhvkV-0003DV-JD@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4819


virginia.smith@hp.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|johnarwe@us.ibm.com         |cmsmcq@w3.org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
           Keywords|needsAgreement              |editorial
   Target Milestone|---                         |LC




------- Comment #2 from virginia.smith@hp.com  2007-10-16 23:22 -------
Resolution
1. Remove last sentence in 3.4.2
2. reword 2nd to last paragraph in 3.4.2 1st sentence to say that EPR scheme is
not an inter-document reference because the scheme is defined that way.
3. Add statement in EPR scheme definition in SML spec to say that the EPR
scheme is not an inter-document reference in SML-IF.
4. Check rest of section to tighten up wording based on new requirement that
scheme definition must state whether or not it is an SML-IF inter-document
reference.
5. Shorten 1st sentence of last para reads "..hints as inter-document
references."

Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:23:02 UTC