- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:16:19 -0400
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFD458D0F6.DE6F9431-ON85257372.004E0A9A-85257372.004E8EB2@us.ibm.com>
I always read the target to indicate prioritization, regardless of its state. Thus a current-draft-targetted editorial bug would ordinarily be serviced preferentially over editorial bugs lacking the current draft target qualification, all other things equal. I have no objection if we require target draft to be set when a bug transitions into editorial, however I think we must allow target draft to be set earlier. We used target draft (and P1/P2 within a draft) during July for example on non-editorial bugs to indicate what order we thought they needed to be resolved in, regardless of whether the next immediate step for any given bug was to author a proposal, discuss a proposal, or do editorial updates once a proposal had been agreed to. Best Regards, John Street address: 2455 South Road, Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601 Voice: 1+845-435-9470 Fax: 1+845-432-9787
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 14:16:55 UTC