- From: Smith, Virginia (HP Software) <virginia.smith@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:11:17 -0000
- To: <public-sml@w3.org>
I updated the bug with my proposed text changes for the SML spec. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4656 My impression from the meeting is that we can probably all agree with the above proposed changes. However, I believe we have a more contentious issue with regard to sml-if. =>Is a conforming SML-IF consumer required to support fragment identifiers in the uri scheme if it processes an SML reference? [[Note that conforming consumers aren't required to process all aspects of an SML-IF doc. Specifically, "A program is a conforming SML-IF Consumer if it processes a conforming SML-IF Document using, in whole or part, semantics defined by this specification. A conforming SML-IF Consumer is not required to process all elements defined in this specification, but any element that is processed must be processed in a manner that is consistent with the semantics defined here."]] I propose we add this discussion to the face to face meeting agenda. -- ginny
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 00:10:09 UTC