W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > October 2007

[w3c sml] Action 130 - reword spec for bug 4656

From: Smith, Virginia (HP Software) <virginia.smith@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:11:17 -0000
Message-ID: <4ED4BEA3C04CAF4C8F9BEE10116D2E3003349DC3@G3W0067.americas.hpqcorp.net>
To: <public-sml@w3.org>

I updated the bug with my proposed text changes for the SML spec.

My impression from the meeting is that we can probably all agree with
the above proposed changes.

However, I believe we have a more contentious issue with regard to

=>Is a conforming SML-IF consumer required to support fragment
identifiers in the uri scheme if it processes an SML reference? 

[[Note that conforming consumers aren't required to process all aspects
of an SML-IF doc. Specifically,  "A program is a conforming SML-IF
Consumer if it processes a conforming SML-IF Document using, in whole or
part, semantics defined by this specification. A conforming SML-IF
Consumer is not required to process all elements defined in this
specification, but any element that is processed must be processed in a
manner that is consistent with the semantics defined here."]]

I propose we add this discussion to the face to face meeting agenda.

Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 00:10:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:24:23 UTC