- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:32:23 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5134
Summary: Digital signature and SML-IF
Product: SML
Version: FPWD
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Interchange Format
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
When SML model documents are included in an SML-IF document, they may have
associated digital signatures, and these signatures may become invalid if the
enclosed documents are altered in certain ways.
Should IF impose a requirement that, when documents are included in IF, they
never need to be modified in a way not compatible with XML Canonicalization?
Or should the above be allowed, and indicate that digital signatures are
(should be) generated *after* the modifications are made?
Or should IF not view this as a requirement and be silent about it?
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:32:31 UTC