- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 04:54:17 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4639 kumarp@microsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |hasProposal ------- Comment #1 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2007-10-03 04:54 ------- I agree with the proposal from Virginia (CyclesInSMLModels.doc) that SML should define cycles as element based. The proposal leaves open the issue whether we should also have document based cycles. I propose that we should have only one type of cycles: element-based. That is, we should not have document based cycles.
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 04:54:23 UTC