- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:38:12 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5112 ------- Comment #1 from johnarwe@us.ibm.com 2007-10-01 15:37 ------- Also note that 3.5.2 Bindings defined paragraph 1 (proposed move to SML) contains the following "For a model to be valid, every document in the model must conform to the constraints defined by every rule document it is bound to." Since SMLIF does not require exchange of a valid model, it is pretty meaningless to make assertions about model validity in SMLIF.
Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 15:38:29 UTC