Wednesday, 31 October 2007
- [Bug 5105] sml 4.2.1 uri scheme nits
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 5024] sml:keyref example
- [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique
- [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique
- RE: RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- RE: RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [w3c sml] [Bug 4675] ... consumers and producers are required to implement ... uri scheme
- RE: RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
- [sml] [Issue 4995] Discussion of scoping SML Identity Constraints
Tuesday, 30 October 2007
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?
- [Bug 5095] inter-document references defined inconsistently
- RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- RE: RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 5092] sml 2.2 terminology : clarify and make consistent
- [Bug 5092] sml 2.2 terminology : clarify and make consistent
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- RE: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- RE: RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- RE: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- RE: [w3c sml] Bug 4639 (Action 136) updated cycle proposal document
- RE: [bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
Monday, 29 October 2007
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5104] sml 4.2.1 uri scheme
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- RE: [bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- FW: XML 1.0 and XML 1.1
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
Sunday, 28 October 2007
Saturday, 27 October 2007
Friday, 26 October 2007
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported
- [Bug 5093] sml 3 Dependencies on Other Specifications
- FW: [Bug 5113] smlif minor editorial comments
- RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 5113] smlif minor editorial comments
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-10-25 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- RE: [bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5118] smlif 3.3.2 Document References make documenturi interop floor
Thursday, 25 October 2007
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [w3c sml] Bug 4639 (Action 136) updated cycle proposal document
- [w3c sml] Bug 4639 (Action 136) updated cycle proposal document
- [Bug 5118] smlif 3.3.2 Document References make documenturi interop floor
- [Bug 5109] sml 4.3.2.0 Constraints on Targets
- [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported
- [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged
- [Bug 5169] Consistent definition and use of 'rule document' terminology
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5169] Consistent definition and use of 'rule document' terminology
- [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
- [Bug 5134] Digital signature and SML-IF
- [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes
- [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified?
- [Bug 5025] selectorXPathType & fieldXPathType pattern facets
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
- [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
- [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced?
- Re: [bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 5118] smlif 3.3.2 Document References make documenturi interop floor
- [Bug 5109] sml 4.3.2.0 Constraints on Targets
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed
- RE: [bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed
- RE: [bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- RE: [bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 5114] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5109] sml 4.3.2.0 Constraints on Targets
- [Bug 4977] Schematron queryBinding attribute
- [Bug 5118] smlif 3.3.2 Document References make documenturi interop floor
- [Bug 5027] Update Section 4.1.2.3
- [bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed
- [Bug 4748] undefined term SMLIF section 2.1
- [Bug 4693] Clarify the purpose of applicationUri attribute in Section 5.1
- [bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
Wednesday, 24 October 2007
- [bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-10-24 SML
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-10-24 SML
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-10-11 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
- [Bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
Tuesday, 23 October 2007
Monday, 22 October 2007
Saturday, 20 October 2007
- [Bug 5101] sml 4.1.2 reference semantics
- [Bug 5100] sml 4.1.1 reference definitions
- [Bug 4683] What should deref() return when there are multiple matches
- [Bug 4658] How should deref() treat multiple child elements that use the same reference scheme
- [Bug 5096] section 4 Schemas misleading wrt what sml defines for refs
- [Bug 4976] Is "multiple targets" a reference error?
- [Bug 5111] 4.4 Identity Constraints and later
- [Bug 5214] change un-numbered bulleted lists to numbered lists
- [Bug 5130] clarify the extent of SML constraint symbol space
Friday, 19 October 2007
- [Bug 5177] 3.3 SML-IF Documents must be XML 1.0 - change to >= 1.0
- [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported
- [Bug 4801] Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML identity constraint is specified for an element dec. E, then this constraint is applicable...) to be more crisp about the scope
- [bug 5214] change un-numbered bulleted lists to numbered lists
- [Bug 5214] change un-numbered bulleted lists to numbered lists
- [Bug 5103] sml 4.2.0 ref schemes
- [Bug 5097] section 4 Schemas should be renamed
- [Bug 4739] 5.1.3 smlerr output element node serialization
- [Bug 4739] 5.1.3 smlerr output element node serialization
- [Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\"
Thursday, 18 October 2007
Wednesday, 17 October 2007
- [Bug 5024] sml:keyref example
- [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator"
- [Bug 4976] Is "multiple targets" a reference error?
- [Bug 4906] In 3.4, don't write deref() function into the BNF
- [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances.
- [Bug 4801] Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML identity constraint is specified for an element dec. E, then this constraint is applicable...) to be more crisp about the scope
- [Bug 4801] Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML identity constraint is specified for an element dec. E, then this constraint is applicable...) to be more crisp about the scope
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
- [Bug 4776] conflicts between schema and text - declare which wins
- [Bug 4772] add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages?
- [Bug 4771] add name/id to rule bindings?
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- [Bug 4769] Mark model instance documents as root?
- [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered
- [Bug 4748] undefined term SMLIF section 2.1
- [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
- [Bug 4693] Clarify the purpose of applicationUri attribute in Section 5.1
- [Bug 4644] Allow assertions on local elements and types
- [Bug 5104] sml 4.2.1 uri scheme
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- proposal for bug 4687 on handling DTDs when composing SML-IF documents
- [Bug 5027] Update Section 4.1.2.3
- SML f2f 10/16 minutes
Tuesday, 16 October 2007
- [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?
- [Bug 4872] SML shouldn't reference xpointer
- [Bug 4865] clearly doc requirements for defining a reference scheme
- [Bug 5117] unresolved references defined inconsistently
- [Bug 4823] In 3.3.6, Replace: If neither of these cases applies, the inter-document reference is to a document not included in the interchange set. Such a reference is called \"an unresolved inter-document reference.\"
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\"
- [Bug 4801] Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML identity constraint is specified for an element dec. E, then this constraint is applicable...) to be more crisp about the scope
- [Bug 4739] 5.1.3 smlerr output element node serialization
- [Bug 4683] What should deref() return when there are multiple matches
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 3.2 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4658] How should deref() treat multiple child elements that use the same reference scheme
- [Bug 4643] inheritance of identity constraints through substitution - align with XSD?
- [Bug 5130] clarify the extent of SML constraint symbol space
- [Bug 4977] Schematron queryBinding attribute
- [Bug 4684] Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique?
- [Bug 5177] 3.3 SML-IF Documents must be XML 1.0 - change to >= 1.0
- [Bug 5121] smlif 3.4.3 SML reference schemes that are not SML-IF inter-document references
Monday, 15 October 2007
- [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references
- [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced?
- [Bug 5118] smlif 3.3.2 Document References make documenturi interop floor
- [Bug 5117] unresolved references defined inconsistently
- [Bug 5114] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5098] sml section 4 Schemas text should be moved into Intro
- [w3c sml] Bug defect diagram 2
Sunday, 14 October 2007
Friday, 12 October 2007
- [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?
- [Bug 4657] Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML implementation built on top of relational databases
- [Bug 4684] Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique?
- RE: defect lifecycle diagram - 2 more cases not covered..
- [W3C SML] [Issue 4684] Revised proposal document regarding sml:keyref reference to xs:key
- Re: ref bugs
- RE: defect lifecycle diagram - 2 more cases not covered..
- Re: ref bugs
- ref bugs
Thursday, 11 October 2007
- RE: RE: defect lifecycle diagram - 2 more cases not covered..
- RE: RE: defect lifecycle diagram - 2 more cases not covered..
- [w3c sml] [minutes] [ver 2] 2007-10-04 SML Teleconference
- RE: defect lifecycle diagram - 2 more cases not covered..
- defect lifecycle diagram - 2 more cases not covered..
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5169] Consistent definition and use of 'rule document' terminology
- [Bug 5107] sml 4.3 Constraints on References - delete redundant text
- [Bug 5104] sml 4.2.1 uri scheme
- [Bug 5095] inter-document references defined inconsistently
- [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [w3c sml] Action 129 - update reference cycles proposal
- [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
Wednesday, 10 October 2007
- [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged
- [Bug 5177] 3.3 SML-IF Documents must be XML 1.0 - change to >= 1.0
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-10-11 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [w3c sml] [minutes] 2007-10-04 SML Teleconference
- revised schema binding proposal - v2
Tuesday, 9 October 2007
- [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references
- [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references
- [Bug 5169] Consistent definition and use of 'rule document' terminology
- [w3c sml] Schema 1.1 Structures review - action required by 2007-10-17
Monday, 8 October 2007
- [w3c sml] Action 130 - reword spec for bug 4656
- [Bug 4656] Restrict XPointer for SML implementations on top of relational databases?
Sunday, 7 October 2007
Thursday, 4 October 2007
- [Bug 5134] Digital signature and SML-IF
- RE: Action 108 - tracking bugs - 'Reviewed' keyword cannot be used
- Action 118 - Explore implementation of deref() in xPath
- [Bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4684] Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique?
- Re: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-10-04 SML
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-09-20 SML Teleconference
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-09-27 SML Teleconference
- RE: Action 108 - tracking bugs - 'Reviewed' keyword cannot be used
- Action 108 - tracking bugs - 'Reviewed' keyword cannot be used
- [Bug 5130] clarify the extent of SML constraint symbol space
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 5130] clarify the extent of SML constraint symbol space
Wednesday, 3 October 2007
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [w3c sml][Action 21] Make a proposal for the definition of an element based cycle.
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-10-04 SML
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [Bug 4657] Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML implementation built on top of relational databases
- [Bug 4656] Restrict XPointer for SML implementations on top of relational databases?
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- RE: [BUG 4647] resolved while blocked
- [BUG 4647] resolved while blocked
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear
Tuesday, 2 October 2007
Monday, 1 October 2007
- blizzard of new bugs
- [4801] scope of SML identity constraints
- [Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\"
- [Bug 5121] smlif 3.4.3 SML reference schemes that are not SML-IF inter-document references
- [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references
- [Bug 5119] consolidate defs of uri and epr schemes in sml spec
- [Bug 5118] smlif 3.3.2 Document References make documenturi interop floor
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5117] unresolved references defined inconsistently
- [Bug 5100] sml 4.1.1 reference definitions
- [Bug 5114] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5114] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5116] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5115] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5115] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5116] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5114] smlif 3.4.4 document aliases - normative text dropped
- [Bug 5102] sml uri and epr schemes - refer to them consistently
- [Bug 5113] smlif minor editorial comments
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5102] sml uri and epr schemes - refer to them consistently
- [Bug 5091] distinguish between normative and non-normative content consistently and clearly in both specs