Friday, 30 November 2007
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-11-29 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
Thursday, 29 November 2007
- [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances.
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4772] add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages?
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
- [Bug 5024] sml:keyref example
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged
- [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ?
- [Bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed
- [Bug 4657] Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML implementation built on top of relational databases
- [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 5108] sml 4.3.1 sml:acyclic
- [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances.
- Re: [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 ...
- RE: [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances
- [w3c sml] Revised proposal for 4774 schema binding
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?
- [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- [w3c sml] [issue 4637] EPR Scheme
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
Wednesday, 28 November 2007
- [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- Re: Section 4.2.2 SML EPR Reference Scheme
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-11-26 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5294] Add an explanation on why the smlif:dataType has processContents=skip
- [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics
- [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-29 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- [Bug 5133] xpath restrictions should be removed
- [Bug 4772] add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages?
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics
- RE: any experience with abusing w3c sites ?..
- [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
Tuesday, 27 November 2007
- any experience with abusing w3c sites ?..
- [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be
- [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics
- [Bug 5291] Add 'Consistent Reference Schemes' section under 4.2 Reference Semantics
- June 2008 meeting dates
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
Monday, 26 November 2007
- [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be
- [Bug 4656] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be
- [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-26bv SML
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-26bv SML
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-26bv SML
- meeting minutes for Nov 19 - updated version
- [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?
- [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element
Sunday, 25 November 2007
Saturday, 24 November 2007
Friday, 23 November 2007
Thursday, 22 November 2007
- [Bug 5113] smlif minor editorial comments
- [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ?
- [Bug 5113] smlif minor editorial comments
- [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element
Wednesday, 21 November 2007
- [Bug 5098] sml section 4 Schemas text should be moved into Intro
- [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element
- [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ?
- [Bug 5110] sml 4.3.2.1 sml:targetElement - 4.3.2.3 sml:targetType
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- [Bug 5277] Update usage of IF 'inter-document references' in the SML spec
- Section 4.2.2 SML EPR Reference Scheme
- [Bug 5277] Update usage of to IF 'inter-document references' in the SML spec
Tuesday, 20 November 2007
- [Bug 5119] consolidate defs of uri and epr schemes in sml spec
- RE: [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced?
- [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references
- [Bug 4777] Remove requirement that anyURI and its derivations be treated as inter-document refs
Monday, 19 November 2007
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
- [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections
- meeting minutes , 11/19/07
- [Bug 4776] conflicts between schema and text - declare which wins
- [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ?
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
- [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced?
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references
- [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references
- [Bug 4777] Remove requirement that anyURI and its derivations be treated as inter-document refs
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 5178] interop criteria when SML compliant documents using different schema versions are exchanged
- RE: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal
Sunday, 18 November 2007
- [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved
- [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- RE: [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
Friday, 16 November 2007
- [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ?
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-19 SML
- [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ?
- [Bug 5272] Can a data element contain more than one document ?
- [w3c sml][minutes] Minutes for 2007-11-15 SML Telecon
- FW: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal
- RE: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal
- RE: SMLIF inter-document reference proposal
Thursday, 15 November 2007
- [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [w3c sml] XML 1.0 erratum
- [Bug 5095] inter-document references defined inconsistently
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
- [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element
- SMLIF inter-document reference proposal
- [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator"
- [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved
- [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered
- [Bug 4772] add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages?
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- ACTION 133 - uncover usecases for the xml output format on schematron rules
- ACTION 143 - Create proposal on bugzilla 4772 - add keyword substitution in smlerr localized messages?
- [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator"
- Regrets 2007-11-15 SML
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator"
- [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved
- [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically
- [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
Wednesday, 14 November 2007
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-15 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes
- [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes
- RE: [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique
- [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes
- [Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\"
- RE: Please review bugs marked as needsReview
- Re: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-15 SML Teleconference
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-15 SML Teleconference
- [Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?
- [w3C sml] [4637: EPR Scheme] Beginnings of a proposal on the EPR Scheme
- [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections
- [Bug 4819] Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address \" the phrase \"or any other schemes other than uri\"
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator"
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically
- [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4788] Change all usages of URI to URI-reference which includes both absolute and relative forms of URIs.
Tuesday, 13 November 2007
- [Bug 4755] SMLIF section 3.3.6 some fragment URI cases not covered
- RE: [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- FW: [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved
- [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- RE: can't access editor's copies
- RE: can't access editor's copies
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
Monday, 12 November 2007
- RE: can't access editor's copies
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 4994] Portable interpretation of "locator"
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 5119] consolidate defs of uri and epr schemes in sml spec
- [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- can't access editor's copies
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- RE: [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-12 SML
- [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element
- Please review bugs marked as needsReview
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes
- [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections
- [Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme
- [Bug 5112] rule binding concept should move to sml
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-12 SML
- [Bug 5239] Correct definition of ref attribute of sml:key/sml:unique
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
Saturday, 10 November 2007
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 5215] SML-IF spec must make normative reference to xml schema and schematron versions that must be supported
- [Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified?
Friday, 9 November 2007
- RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [w3c wml] Final review requested - Bug 4811
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [w3c sml] [minutes] 2007-11-08 SML Teleconference
Thursday, 8 November 2007
- [Bug 5259] Rename 'Sample Model (Non-Normative)' section to 'Model Definition Document Sample (Non-Normative)'
- [Bug 5259] Rename 'Sample Model (Non-Normative)' section to 'Model Definition Document Sample (Non-Normative)'
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5201] Documents without aliases cannot be referenced?
- [Bug 5171] Confusing and contradicting sections on resolving inter-document references
- [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references
- [Bug 5119] consolidate defs of uri and epr schemes in sml spec
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
- [Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-08 SML
- [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements
Wednesday, 7 November 2007
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
- RE: [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
- [Bug 4995] Scoping of sml identity constraints (key, keyref, unique)
- regrets for the 11/08 teleconference
- Fw: [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
- [Bug 4746] clarify SMLIF section 2 signature requirements
- [Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections
Tuesday, 6 November 2007
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5108] sml 4.3.1 sml:acyclic
- RE: [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified
Monday, 5 November 2007
- [Bug 5181] xml:base intended to replace smlif:baseURI only
- [Bug 5120] smlif 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references
- [Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints
- RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- Re: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5248] What does it mean if <locator> is not resolved
- [Bug 5247] <data> without a sub-element
- Re: [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [w3c sml] About Conforming Processor (was [Bug 4675] ...)
- RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5245] IF : Replace [Schematron] with [ISO/IEC 19757-3] in non-normative reference
- [Bug 5245] IF : Replace [Schematron] with [ISO/IEC 19757-3] in non-normative reference
Sunday, 4 November 2007
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [w3c sml] Bug 4639 - cycle proposal recommendation
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 4894] Clarify that acyclicity is determined polymorphically
Saturday, 3 November 2007
- RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- RE: [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
- [Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref()
Friday, 2 November 2007
- [Bug 5243] SML - Rename Informative Reference Section to Non-Normative Reference
- [Bug 5243] SML - Rename Informative Reference Section to Non-Normative Reference
- RE: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- FW: [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- [Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme
- RE: [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon
- RE: [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon
- RE: [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon
- [w3c sml] Minutes for 2007-11-01 SML Telecon
- [Bug 5121] smlif 3.4.3 SML reference schemes that are not SML-IF inter-document references
- [Bug 5107] sml 4.3 Constraints on References - delete redundant text
- [Bug 5102] sml uri and epr schemes - refer to them consistently
- [Bug 5025] selectorXPathType & fieldXPathType pattern facets
- [Bug 4865] clearly doc requirements for defining a reference scheme
- [Bug 5242] define how the EPR scheme is resolved
- [Bug 5241] define how the SML URI scheme is resolved
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes
Thursday, 1 November 2007
- [Bug 5108] sml 4.3.1 sml:acyclic
- RE: [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 4811] Clarify section 6.1 regarding Schematron phases
- [Bug 4978] Is smlerr:output necessary?
- [Bug 4770] Decide which schema elements should be changed to global
- [Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document
- [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-10-15 SML
- Regrets 2007-11-01 SML
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-01 SML
- RE: RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 5107] sml 4.3 Constraints on References - delete redundant text
- RE: [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-01 SML
- [Bug 4639] Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as document graphs
- [Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema
- [Bug 5095] inter-document references defined inconsistently
- [Bug 5117] unresolved references defined inconsistently
- [w3c sml][agenda] 2007-11-01 SML