W3C

SML Working Group

24 May 2007

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Plh, Virginia_Smith, Pratul, John, Sandy, Marvin_Waschke, James_Lynn, Zulah
Regrets
Kirk_Wilson, Paul_Lipton, Bassam_Tabbara, Heather_Kreger, David_Orchard
Chair
John, Pratul
Scribe
plh

Contents


 

 

<scribe> Scribe: plh

Introduction of chairs, team contacts and participants

[going around the table]

Administrative

[John is going through the list of resources]

John: everything is in the WG will be public unless you speak up to indicate otherwise
... things like call-in numbers, f2f meeting information will be Members-only
... bugzilla is intended for bugs in the spec. tracker is intended to track action items.

<scribe> ACTION: Philippe to check the trackbot [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/24-sml-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-1 - Check the trackbot [on Philippe Le Hégaret - due 2007-05-31].

John: good standing rules: you're expected to make 2 out of 3 meetings in a row
... selection of scribes: we'll go through the list of participants for this duty. round robin approach.
... Marvin is willing to scribe next week

List of up-coming Scribes, in order

  1. Waschke, Marvin
  2. Wilson, Kirk
  3. Tabbara, Bassam
  4. Eckert, Zulah
  5. Kreger, Heather
  6. Orchard, David
  7. Smith, Virginia
  8. Gao, Sandy
  9. Lynn, James
  10. Lipton, Paul

John: Off-line question: are there any toll free call in numbers? Not on Zakim, I checked with our Team Contacts. We are using Zakim for the logistical help it provides w.r.t. minutes etc. Are we required to use Zakim?

Philippe: there is no enforced policy to zakim, but we provide support for it, unlike other teleconference bridge.

John: Unless there are strong objections, propose we stick with Zakim.

[none heard]

Resolution: Continue using Zakim

WG distributed meeting schedule

John: Pratul and I propose that the WG NOT take a break in August 2007.
... any objection?

[none heard]

Resolution: No break in August 2007

John: any conflict with the current timeslot?

Resolution: Thursdays, 2-4pm US/Eastern, will be the timeslot

John: As a WG, we can't just declare our f2f days, we have to propose them to the coordination group.
... first f2f meeting: Redmond, WA June 11-13 (hosted by Microsoft)
... http://www.w3.org/2007/06/sml-f2f-logistics.html

<scribe> ACTION: All to register for the f2f meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/24-sml-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot-ng> Sorry, couldn't find user - All

John: we need volunteer to host a f2f in August, probably later half of August.
... see http://www.w3.org/Guide/hosting.htm
... also let us know if you won't be available sometimes in August, especially the latter half
... October is an opportunity to meet next to the XML Schema WG
... they're meeting on 8-12 of October, maybe in Redmond
... we'll try to co-locate

Pratul: I'm under the impression that MS will likely host it, but the dates are definitive

John: I already told the CG that we are interested in co-locating
... for the technical plenary, we'll skip since we'll try to co-locate with Schema

Submitting SML Issues

John: right now, we have http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/SUBM-sml-20070321/ http://www.w3.org/Submission/2007/SUBM-sml-if-20070321/

Pratul: can I submit issues against the submission?

Philippe: please do

John: how to raise an issue with Member confidential information in it?

Philippe: it never happened in the past, best is to deal with it if the case happens

Editors

John: their responsibilities will be to write the resolution of the WG into the specifications
... will need volunteers
... any editor is expected to be able to edit any of the documents. 2-3 hours/week.
... we're looking for 4 to 6 people
... we need to identify the editors by the 1st f2f meeting

Pratul: editor' names will appear at the top of the specification

SML WG F2F Agenda

John: we need to know about potential f2f agenda items
... we'll put any technical issue that come up between now and then
... the notion of where the schema comes from will need to be opened as an issue
... the current draft that addresses where to fetch the schemas
... nothing which is specific and normative enough to guarantee interop currently exists in SML IF

other business?

[adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: All to register for the f2f meeting [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/24-sml-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Philippe to check the trackbot [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/24-sml-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes] --=_mixed 0073E7E3852572E5_=--