- From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 07:52:56 -0500
- To: "Smith, Virginia (HP Software)" <virginia.smith@hp.com>, <public-sml@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 7 December 2007 12:53:13 UTC
Attached are my comments on the proposal. With the introduction of the <referenceScheme> element under the scenario that Michael described, I think we are now at the point of recognizing an "intermingling" of the concepts of document conformance and interoperability. (See my final comment on the non-normative section.) And, IMHO, we should deal with distinction between document conformance and interoperability even if we don't have the <referenceScheme>!! Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. Research Staff Member CA Labs 603 823-7146 -----Original Message----- From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Virginia (HP Software) Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:32 AM To: public-sml@w3.org Subject: [w3c sml] SML-IF conformance Attached is a draft of the SML-IF conformance proposal that we discussed today. -- ginny
Received on Friday, 7 December 2007 12:53:13 UTC