Hi Jake, Did you see/read Rachael’s presentation on the protocols/assertions next steps? https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1b5xHQWBzoYdKp7BfPgIUBCpz-yaDOx_kSq_HlQxcFh0/edit#slide=id.g115ec01aa81_0_39 I think we’re saying similar things, so to transpose your buckets onto the proposal: Constant Condition Test Case Protocol Smallest Unit Bucket 1 1 2 2 View 1 1 2 2 User Process 1 1 2 2 Aggregate 1 1 2 2 I have been assuming that requirements for the organisation (bucket 3) would be covered in the maturity model work, which could be incorporated into WCAG3 in future, but that is a future decision. I think there is also alignment between what John called “Vetted and approved” and the Test Case, and “Internal or Company-Authored” and Protocol. I don’t want to get hung up on the terms, we can work on that, I just wanted to separate the organisational level aspects from the requirements for the product/thing/website. Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Monday, 7 March 2022 09:57:24 UTC