- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 18:26:38 -0500
- To: public-silver@w3.org
Colleagues: Just a gentle reminder to respond to the WBS on the Example Scenarios document we will continue discussing in our weekly teleconference this Thursday. Shadi has updated the document following our discussions to date, and the WBS now contains a full range of questions covering all scenario categories. Shadi's human readable diff follows: # Changes * Tweaked Example 1.2 to include automatically-generated captions as a temporary step while producing quality captions for the videos * Tweaked Example 1.3 to have a company acquire the MOOC provider with inaccessible courses, which addresses an earlier comment from Wilco * Tweaked Example 1.3 to call out automatically playing videos as an example of inaccessible content that can impede on the accessibility of other content * Added new Example 1.4 on "adapting content to changed requirements", where an updated accessibility standard impact content and applications * Added new Example 7.3 featuring a "product demo with limited functionality and accessibility", that is different from a Beta product * Drafted new "Situation 10: Not all accessibility requirements are always applicable" to address this and other examples <end diff> As agreed on last week's call, our discussions will be driven by taking up comments submitted via the WBS, so do please get your thoughts into the WBS! https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/94845/conf-3rd_party/ Best, Janina -- Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2022 23:27:21 UTC