Re: CFC - Approving WCAG 3 Explainer for publication

+1

On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 15:07, Dirks, Kim (TR Product) <
kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Sajka, Janina [C] <sajkaj@amazon.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:03 AM
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
> *Subject:* [EXT] RE: CFC - Approving WCAG 3 Explainer for publication
>
>
>
> *External Email:* Use caution with links and attachments.
>
>
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 9, 2021 5:48 PM
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] CFC - Approving WCAG 3 Explainer for publication
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday September 15th at 10:00am Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group and Silver Taskforce approved sending the WCAG 3
> Explainer document changes to CFC at the August 3rd meeting
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2021/08/03-ag-minutes.html*item02__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Ofj4H-DP5XgwXf7ITF8lbhyIPot0EMrnQhG9IWpYMTsJhVSeRQGX4OIT-bqIbEMlTv4fKcy-fw$>
> along with an editor’s note.
>
>
>
> I emailed the text of the editor’s note
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-silver/2021Aug/0026.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Ofj4H-DP5XgwXf7ITF8lbhyIPot0EMrnQhG9IWpYMTsJhVSeRQGX4OIT-bqIbEMlTv454wFTTw$>
> out for any comment on August 10th and received no changes.  Since then
> we agreed during joint meetings not to include the guideline related
> updates so they have been removed from the editor’s note list of changes
> for this publication.
>
>
>
> The resulting document can be previewed at
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/silver/Explainer_edits-js/explainer/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/rawgit.com/w3c/silver/Explainer_edits-js/explainer/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Ofj4H-DP5XgwXf7ITF8lbhyIPot0EMrnQhG9IWpYMTsJhVSeRQGX4OIT-bqIbEMlTv40E8hcpQ$>
>
>
>
> The pull request is at https://github.com/w3c/silver/pull/533
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/silver/pull/533__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!Ofj4H-DP5XgwXf7ITF8lbhyIPot0EMrnQhG9IWpYMTsJhVSeRQGX4OIT-bqIbEMlTv6_HJlb3Q$>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD
>
> Digital Accessibility Specialist
>
> Library of Congress
>
> Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov
>