Re: CFC for WCAG 3 - User Generated Content

+1

El mar, 31 ago 2021 a las 16:11, Nicaise Dogbo (CELA) (<
nidogbo@microsoft.com>) escribió:

> +1
>
>
>
> Thx,
>
>
>
> ND
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 30, 2021 5:22 AM
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] CFC for WCAG 3 - User Generated Content
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday, September 3rd at 11:00 am Boston time.
>
>
>
>
>
> The AG Working Group and Silver taskforce have discussed integrating the work done on user generated content and the related editor’s note into the September WCAG 3 publication. We most recently discussed this at the joint AG/Silver Meeting on August 10th <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F08%2F10-ag-minutes.html%23t05&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C407ba52ca5ef43b6b80508d96bb0da4b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637659229601406528%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=TYuu%2Bt3hdAj1iCrXAh4o4pP4Uu3dWghEyITYK8u2ea0%3D&reserved=0> and a pre-cfc email <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fw3c-wai-gl%2F2021JulSep%2F0088.html&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C407ba52ca5ef43b6b80508d96bb0da4b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637659229601406528%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=jcmDFfsF2W1n1jmIVc7kuQWiJINfLsQX87g%2BeFvz7VQ%3D&reserved=0> went out afterwards.
>
>
>
> The file changes (diff) are at: https://github.com/w3c/silver/pull/546/files
>
>
>
> The content preview is at: https://rawgit.com/w3c/silver/User_Generated/guidelines/index.html#user-generated-content
>
>
>
>
>
> Issue 450 <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fsilver%2Fissues%2F450&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C407ba52ca5ef43b6b80508d96bb0da4b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637659229601416484%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=E%2FPRz75r%2F5ZhPD2dj8%2Fx8ZK58Z3f6d3%2F8ldLTkLBpbE%3D&reserved=0> is addressed by this CfC.
>
>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD
>
> Digital Accessibility Specialist
>
> Library of Congress
>
> Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov
>