W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > November 2021

Re: Conversation Needed: Finalize labels for levels of content

From: Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 23:34:31 -0800
Cc: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <49255776-A839-4819-85EC-F490B5A45157@generaltitles.com>
To: "Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael" <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
Hi Rachel, all,

IMO “Polishing” is a little odd. “Stable" is used a lot, but the description on the link seems different from the traditional use as it applies to IT.

My suggestions are:


Another alternate for 4 might be “Evaluation” and for 5,  “Provisional”.

Thank you,


> On Nov 11, 2021, at 8:26 AM, Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov> wrote:
> Hello,
> An outstanding decision from Tuesday’s meeting was to finalize the label names. This email is going to AG, Silver, and COGA to allow the broadest participation in the conversation.
> The current label names are:
> Placeholder:
> Exploratory
> Maturing
> Polishing
> Stable
> Concerns were expressed about Polishing and Stable as they have alternate meanings so may be confusing.
> You can read more about the overall process and how these terms fit in athttps://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/AG_process <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/AG_process>   
> Do you think the current terms work or, if not, what would you suggest as an alternative?
> Please reply to all lists for this conversation.
> Kind regards,
> Rachael
> ---
> Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD
> Digital Accessibility Specialist
> Library of Congress
> Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov <mailto:rmontgomery@loc.gov>

Received on Friday, 12 November 2021 07:35:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:54 UTC