- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@tetralogical.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:29:15 +0000
- To: Rachael Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>, Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>, AGWG Chairs <group-ag-chairs@w3.org>
Thank you Rachel. +1 to the proposal. On 16/02/2021 17:13, Rachael Montgomery wrote: > Leonie, > > Thank you for the request. Please see below. > > *Enhanced Acknowledgements Proposal* > > Goals: > > * To have the names actually be more useful than just an > undifferentiated list, but avoid the burden of maintaining specific > individual contributions. > * To have sections of Acknowledgements with people’s names in the > sections. People can be in more than one section. With a sectioned > list, it is possible to narrow down who was working on specific > sections and make it easier to find individual accomplishments. > > > Here are the proposed sections. > *Authors*: People who wrote big swathes of WCAG3 and also the people who > could be counted on to write small proposals that solved big problems. > > *Subgroup Leaders*: From the Subgroup list on the wiki home page. These > people deserve lots of credit. Ping Jeanne if they need to be updated. > > *Subgroup Participants*: This could be grabbed from the Subgroup home > pages where there is a participant list. We can ask the subgroup leaders > to keep that list up to date. > > *Researchers*: People whose research outside of task force/working group > meetings were used in the development of WCAG 3. This is where I see > people like Andy, Mike Crabb, Joshue, Francis, Jake, Cybele, Luis, > Jemma, Sarah, Dave Sloan. > > *Participating Contributors*: The people who regularly showed up, and > especially participated and scribed. This should be the people that > participated regularly for more than 6 months. Regularly should be > defined as at least x (3-5? 6-8?) meetings per month on average. I > don’t mean to calculate each one, but in case it is challenged, we have > that definition. > > On Feb 16, 2021, 12:11 PM -0500, Léonie Watson > <lwatson@tetralogical.com>, wrote: >> Rachel, >> >> Could you share the proposal in email? GoogleDocs are not usable by >> everyone, and not available in all parts of the world. >> >> Thanks >> Léonie. >> >> On 16/02/2021 15:58, Rachael Bradley Montgomery wrote: >>> Call For Consensus — ends Friday February 19th at 10:00 Boston time. >>> >>> The Working Group has discussed criteria for acknowledgement sections in >>> WCAG 3.0 >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BjH_9iEr_JL8d7sE7BoQckmkpaDksKZiH7Q-RdDide4/edit#> >>> at >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BjH_9iEr_JL8d7sE7BoQckmkpaDksKZiH7Q-RdDide4/edit# >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BjH_9iEr_JL8d7sE7BoQckmkpaDksKZiH7Q-RdDide4/edit#> >>> >>> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2021/02/09-ag-minutes.html >>> <https://www.w3.org/2021/02/09-ag-minutes.html> >>> >>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have >>> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you >>> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let both groups know >>> before the CfC deadline. >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> >>> Rachael >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rachael Montgomery, PhD >>> Director, Accessible Community >>> rachael@accessiblecommunity.org <mailto:rachael@accessiblecommunity.org> >>> >>> "I will paint this day with laughter; >>> I will frame this night in song." >>> - Og Mandino >>> >> >> -- >> Director @TetraLogical >> https://tetralogical.com/ -- Director @TetraLogical https://tetralogical.com/
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2021 17:30:00 UTC