- From: Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 15:47:09 -0500
- To: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGQw2hmUghCc8VaVsGEAo7FiskO+8m0vtr4Paj9VVdywvc59rg@mail.gmail.com>
agenda+ Review Conformance issue draft responses - 425 <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/425>- will it be possible for multiple means of measurement to determine if the website conforms? - 448 <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/448>- a small minority of pages with "critical errors" should still pass. Important to large and dynamic sites. - 457 <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/457>- wants flexible conformance for 3rd party, but doesn't want multiple conformance models agenda+ Resolving Conformance Issues - 460 <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/460>- flexibility for conformance is desperately needed. Incentive for adoption. - 470 <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/470>- process approach allows orgs to focus on making core tasks accessible. More clarity on defining process. - 494 <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/494>- how will content-free applications like CMS be evaluated and scored? Conference call info <https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_silver-fri> - Reminder to please sign up to scribe <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Scribe_List>!
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2021 20:47:36 UTC