- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 15:31:46 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <95bef572-6ae0-0dd3-2797-f2870055d8cf@spellmanconsulting.com>
== Summary == * We reviewed changes to the Editors Draft <https://w3c.github.io/silver/guidelines/> based on the feedback from the AGWG meeting. Editorial changes are in process. Michael showed templates for the How-To. He will have a template for the Methods by next week. They are in simple HTML now, and styling can be added later. * Substantive changes were proposed in the Consistency spreadsheet where Sarah took the existing content and organized it in columns so we could evaluate what should go where. This was a very useful exercise and a number of recommendations came from that. We also used it to address a solution to Jake's comments about the need for a test for each functional outcome when no Method applied. o There is a new flowchart for the architecture <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/15u5P_VwQUu--1NXSzu2Wwsj-QalDCt_W> as proposed (pdf document). Also of note is that we have changed the many-to-many relationships to one-to-many relationships. o We proposed changing the term Method to Technique. This was intended to simplify, but several people disagreed that it would be more confusing to change the name, since WCAG3 Technique would be different from a WCAG2 Technique. The group resolved to stay with the term Method. o We agreed to change "Functional Outcome" to "Outcome". Simpler and there were too many "Functional ..." names. o We adopted the proposed changes as recommended in the Consistency spreadsheet including an AND vs OR distinction between Outcomes and Methods. That is, if what is needed to implement a guideline is [this result] AND [this result] AND [this result], the each [this result] should be a Functional Outcome. If there is [this action] OR [this action], they should be Methods under the Outcome. This also allows the Functional Needs of the Guideline to pass more smoothly to the individual Functional Outcomes and the Methods without a many-to-many relationship. * We discussed the proposed solution to Jake's concern of a test for a Functional Outcome that did not have a Method. (This was also a concern of David McDonald's last February). We are proposing a Fallback Method if none of the other methods apply. This could happen in the case of: o proprietary technology o emerging technology o AGWG hasn't written the method yet * We generally agreed to the idea, but did not have agreement on the name when the time ran out. We will continue the discussion on Tuesday. == Minutes == https://www.w3.org/2020/09/04-silver-minutes.html
Received on Friday, 4 September 2020 19:32:00 UTC