Hey Chuck,
I have three minor concerns with the decision policy. It would be great if
these could be addressed:
- If a decision is made on the call, there does not seem to be a way for
anyone who was not on the call to raise an objection. I would suggest that
any decisions made on a call be announced via e-mail, so that anyone who
couldn't attend still has the opportunity to raise their objections.
- It would be good to clarify that "meetings" here means just official task
force meetings, and that decisions can not be made by subgroups.
- There is no description of what form a "call for objections" can take.
For example, AG has a policy where we use a CFC e-mail, which can only be
about a single decision that has to be clear from the title. Some
description like that would go a long way to clarifying this.
Kind regards,
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:22 AM Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday, October 23th at 6pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed approving the Silver Decision Policy:
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/decision-policy
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/decision-policy__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!NV8my_YWwoy5johoR3DYFLKC0GiX1r4G-RN1U7LNGG2s6pY9LsNhc_iaTXADZKIAKA$>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision policy, please let the group know
> before the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Charles Adams
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe-core product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R
Join me at axe-con <http://deque.com/axe-con> 2021: a free digital
accessibility conference.
