- From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:58:41 +0200
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMpCG4H8VSz=AMorYvVVLnonp3CPazXmo6nY=RpdJhoW2kB+WQ@mail.gmail.com>
I don't see any issues here by adding dates / time stamps to a conformance claim. - First of all for the specific conformance claim / report - If other reports are included with another time stamp, mention it (also the time stamp and which part it is) - The responsibility is up to the "conformance claimer" if he chooses a report to include but didn't check if it's still actual. We only provide guidance for how to test and score and ask for time stamps. How a tool vendor places it in a dashboard is totally up to the tool vendor. Cheers! Jake Op ma 11 mei 2020 om 18:10 schreef John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>: > Hi All, > > During our calls last week, the use-case of monitoring conformance > dashboards was raised. > > One important need for *on-going score calculation* will be for usage in > these scenarios. After a bit of research, it appears that many different > accessibility conformance tools are today offering this > feature/functionality already. > > Please see: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PgmVS0s8_klxvV2ImZS1GRXHwUgKkoXQ1_y6RBMIZQw/edit?usp=sharing > > ...for examples that I was able to track down. (Note, some examples today > remain at the page level - for example Google Lighthouse - whereas other > tools are offering composite or aggregated views of 'sites' of at least > 'directories' [sic].) > > It is in scenarios like this that I question the 'depreciation' of > user-testing scores over time (in the same way that new cars depreciate > when you drive them off the lot, and continue to do so over the life of the > vehicle). > > Large organizations are going to want up-to-date dashboards, which > mechanical testing can facilitate quickly, but the more complex and > labor-intensive tests will be run infrequently over the life-cycle of a > site or web-content, and I assert that this infrequency will have an impact > on the 'score': user-test data that is 36 months old will likely be 'dated' > over that time-period, and in fact may no longer be accurate. > > Our scoring mechanism will need to address that situation. > > JF > -- > *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative > Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good > deque.com > "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - > Pascal > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2020 07:59:08 UTC