RE: Summary & Minutes of Silver meeting of 20 March 2020

With regard to scoring concepts, please also keep an adjectival rating approach open for now!
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G0KLv1Nfvy5QWN7t9jPxyE6UEcTHE5A8tKYiDOhuZRY/edit#gid=1833982643




From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 3:24 PM
To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Subject: Summary & Minutes of Silver meeting of 20 March 2020


== Summary ==

We discussed a proposal for some changes to the Editor's Draft<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fsilver%2FED-VF2F-js%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html%23headings&data=02%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C58bf34531aa749e5175d08d7cd048930%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C0%7C637203291684868363&sdata=8Lw46YaztWeeTrREFb2XsIhL%2B7eYCvq122rfXpc5%2FB0%3D&reserved=0> based on Tuesday's discussion of followup from the VF2F.

  1.  The main document (Editor's Draft<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fsilver%2FED-VF2F-js%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html%23headings&data=02%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C58bf34531aa749e5175d08d7cd048930%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C0%7C637203291684868363&sdata=8Lw46YaztWeeTrREFb2XsIhL%2B7eYCvq122rfXpc5%2FB0%3D&reserved=0>) has been modified to add 3 Functional Outcomes for Headings.  We discussed those and made changes which are now in the Editor's draft.
  2.  The How To for Headings Evaluate tab has been changed to reflect the Testing Responsibilities based on the Functional Outcomes.  On the Method tab, a link has been added to a new Method Headings in HTML & Aria
  3.  The new Method: Headings in HTML & ARIA has been added.  It is sketchy, and only illustrates what we have been discussing:  Adding links to the ACT Rules and adding a new Scoring tab.   We agreed to make the Scoring tab technology neutral and move it to the How-To.

We discussed the scoring of the Scoring tab.  There are three proposals:

  1.  Score based on how well the Functional Outcomes are met
  2.  Score based on the groups of EN301549 Functional Needs met
  3.  Give two scores: a score for the minimums met and a "bonus" score for authors that went above and beyond the minimum.  These will need more substantive proposals and some fleshing out.

We also briefly discussed the AGWG Virtual Face to Face meeting Tuesday and Wednesday March 24 & 25.  Silver members who are also AGWG members are encouraged to attend the AGWG meeting.

We will cancel the Silver meetings on Tuesday the 24th to support members attending the AGWG VF2F.

== Minutes ==

https://www.w3.org/2020/03/20-silver-minutes.html<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2020%2F03%2F20-silver-minutes.html&data=02%7C01%7Cbailey%40access-board.gov%7C58bf34531aa749e5175d08d7cd048930%7Cfc6093f5e55e4f93b2cf26d0822201c9%7C0%7C0%7C637203291684878354&sdata=%2Bdiwtgwb1Dk5S6R4oMwPJ6Fm%2B2nkOiYh9NlHu7CoRc4%3D&reserved=0>