Summary & Minutes of Silver meeting

== Summary ==

 1. We heard about the substantial updates to the Challenges document. 
    They pulled out a lot of detail that moved into a appendix. They
    clarified that this document is not an attack on WCAG, but it was
    for helping with a future work. We need to do thorough analysis to
    address future needs. It will be out for a survey the first week in
    March and would appreciate support from Silver.
 2. We discussed proposed changes around conformance that haven't made
    it into a draft yet.  Jeanne will see if she can get it done before
    Tuesday.  She will put it in a new branch.
 3. There is a new survey going out to AGWG about publishing Silver.
    Shawn and I will meet with AGWG on Tuesday to talk about the changes
    made in response to the comments.
 4. We started entering survey results responses into Github issues. 
    Jeanne needs more help because the responses need to be organized
    into common issues.
 5. The CSUN F2F registration has closed because we have reached the
    capacity of the room.  There will be Silver presentation at CSUN.
    <https://www.csun.edu/cod/conference/sessions/index.php/public/presentations/view/4475>
 6. The Scoring Exampl
    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LfzTd_8WgTi0IUOOjUCRfRQ7e7__FRcnZow4w7zLlkY/>e
    has a new introduction to (hopefully) explain it more clearly.   We
    discussed whether we could say that a website or project that passed
    a WCAG 2 automated test could pass at bronze, but there were
    objections.  To be continued...

== Minutes ==

https://www.w3.org/2020/02/21-silver-minutes.html