- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:19:10 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c76a665b-88f7-8ef0-33ee-0b274d06139e@spellmanconsulting.com>
== Summary == We reviewed the Silver Face to face agenda at : https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/2019_September_16-20_in_Fukuoka,_Japan Amazon has identified 3 general areas where they have identified "big challenges" with conformance: 1. Human involvement in testing is much more difficult when pages are highly dynamic. 2. There are always parts of a large website that are under construction 3. The 3rd party content -- especially content from users that may defy best efforts at accessibility. Makoto explained how Japan adapted the WCAG conformance model to address some of these issues. Their conformance model adapts the random sampling model from EU. They test 40 pages, of which 25 should be random. They test only a point in time, using screenshots to show the status of that page at that time. If the pages pass, the site conforms. The conformance does not expire, but the date of the testing is publicly visible. Japan does not have a legal requirement for accessibility, so this is market driven. "People will judge." Cyborg suggested that we could give incentives for improvement at 3 levels: self-improvement (improving legacy material), comparison to other products of a similar category, and comparison to an ideal standard. == Minutes == https://www.w3.org/2019/09/10-silver-conf-minutes.html
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2019 00:19:34 UTC