- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:42:20 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <099f9003-fbe9-f577-cd10-b49e84af8662@spellmanconsulting.com>
== Summary == We started discussing two new documents based on the discussion we are having on Issue #3 "What should conformance be measuring?" Last week's call had asked that a spreadsheet be created to allow us to do a rough scoring of measurement factors so we could see if the results made sense. The first document is anarrative describing the measurement factors in the conformance proposals <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MqSvCiPqZzkO09mxz-K7IP-U74dFX8dLeHX1XmFZt4Y/edit#>. We discussed them and made notes in the document (blue highlighted). Most of the measurements from the first proposal seemed better suited to guidance to be evaluated than to conformance measures. Peter offered to write additional information on Amazon's experience with the WCAG conformance as additional information to feed this discussion. We will continue looking at other proposals next week. We will also start with a narrative evaluation first, rather than jumping straight to a number evaluation, so we can develop what the rubric (range of conditions) are. == Minutes == https://www.w3.org/2019/09/03-silver-conf-irc Note: the technical challenges continue. The formatted version of the minutes didn't create because I made the minutes after UTC midnight, so the minutes were created in 4 Sept and were empty. The raw IRC log from 3 September is available for your reading pleasure.
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2019 00:42:42 UTC