- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 14:27:43 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <c28cd685-191d-e9bf-4342-8b66747b961b@spellmanconsulting.com>
== Summary == Silver has grouped WCAG success criteria with similar user needs and Silver members are writing proposals of the functional needs for each group. Two groups have finished writing functional needs for the WCAG to Silver Migration Map Outline. They presented their findings to the group for discussion. The links below are direct internal links to that heading in the WCAG to Silver Migration Map Outline. * Charles Hall wrote functional needs forSC 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded), SC 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded), SC 1.2.9 Audio-only (Live) <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aCRXrtmnSSTso-6S_IO9GQ3AKTB4FYt9k92eT_1PWX4/edit#heading=h.wybvadozdbds> and SC 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics, SC 1.4.1 Use of Color. <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aCRXrtmnSSTso-6S_IO9GQ3AKTB4FYt9k92eT_1PWX4/edit#heading=h.oks9pxyygjow> He took the WCAG Understanding document and put the Benefits into a standardized language pattern. He used strikeout on the parts that were solution-oriented and put those in the Methods section. We had some discussion about using a disability as an example. Charles thought if we started listing disabilities, we would define the list so that anything we left out would be excluded. Some others thought that having a disability as an example (not a list) would make it easier to understand. * Jan McSorley and colleagues wrote functional needs for SC 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded), SC 1.2.4 Captions (Live), SC 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded) <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aCRXrtmnSSTso-6S_IO9GQ3AKTB4FYt9k92eT_1PWX4/edit#heading=h.fpeqlt9qnga1>. They used a different language pattern for their work. There was discussion about the best pattern for writing the functional needs. We will discuss this more with the entire group on Friday. Concerns were raised about using the phrase "fully understand" would be very difficult to achieve, particularly with artistic works. It was suggested that "effectively understand" would be a better term. == Minutes == https://www.w3.org/2019/09/03-silver-minutes.html
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2019 18:28:05 UTC