- From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:58:54 +0200
- To: Makoto Ueki <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
- Cc: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
I think 2.5.3 Label in Name covers a very distinct aspect (matching visible label to accName) that should be kept separate from 2.4.6 where the point is to check whether label /heading texts are appropriate / descriptive of content or function - a semantic, not programmatic match. So I would recommend *not* to merge these two. Detlev > Am 17.10.2019 um 03:18 schrieb Makoto Ueki <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>: > > Hello everyone, > > Jennifer, Cybele and I are working on SC 1.1.1. > > The migration map merges "SC 1.1.1 Non-text Content" with " SC 1.4.5 Images of Text" and "SC 2.5.3 Label in Name". I think these 3 SC should be separated. > > Because: > - 1.1.1 is about text alternative and machine readability of non-text content. > - 1.4.5 is about not using image of text. 1.4.5 can be merged with 1.4.9 rather than 1.1.1. > - 2.5.3 is about form label so it should be merged with 2.4.6 and/or maybe 1.3.1 rather than 1.1.1. > > Also > - it might be possible to remove things about form label from 1.1.1 as it can be merged with 1.3.1, 2.4.6 and 2.5.3. > > Having things about form controls in 1.1.1 has made 1.1.1 more complicated. > > So our document don't include SC 1.4.5 and 2.5.3 at this moment. We are focusing on SC 1.1.1. > > Any thoughts? > > - Makoto
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2019 05:59:00 UTC