Priorities for the people meeting at AccessU

Silver Community Group members who are attending AccessU have a room at 
the conference donated by Knowbility. We will be meeting on an informal 
basis to work on Silver content in preparation for writing a First 
Public Editors Draft.

We will be writing drafts of WCAG 2.1 success criteria following the 
WCAG to Silver Outline Migration plan 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aCRXrtmnSSTso-6S_IO9GQ3AKTB4FYt9k92eT_1PWX4/edit>. 
These are the success criteria the Silver group have prioritized:

  * Color Contrast (example of new research, merging levels)
  * Timing (example of merging levels, potential for including new content)
  * Alternative Text (different tests than true/false)
  * Sensory Characteristics (ranked hard to learn in research study)
  * Audio description (ranked hard to learn in research study)
  * 1.3.3 (from original plain language prototype) is midrange
    difficultly SC
  * 2.2.2 (from original plain language prototype) is also a midrange
    difficulty SC, but is very long Edit
    <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/index.php?title=Silver_Meeting_2019_May_15-17_in_Austin_TX_USA&action=edit&section=5>

For each WCAG SC:

 1. User Needs - initial breadth
 2. Tests - initial breadth
 3. Evaluate and prioritize the difficulty (for including in FPED)
 4. If doable, write Methods
 5. If #4, write Guideline

Update Style Guide 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSEptjaGO_hPKGTGwuAJR86J09cFGDZT7slWRGDHMGPxrL2TRpY4jnZzyq8zqHpaqiH86LTmFQIs8Fd/pub> as 
we go.