- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:54:30 +0000
- To: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>, "Delisi, Jennie (MNIT)" <jennie.delisi@state.mn.us>, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- CC: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, COGA TF <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
Steve Lee wrote: > I'd rather drop the time element, as John proposed I’m not married to that so long as we have some understanding it will work in the various scenarios John outlined, how about: "Can be feasibly tested through a manual or automated processes, and any tools needed to test it are available before the Candidate Recommendation stage." > I also think Glenda's clarification of ways of testing adds value so could be added. The descriptions are good, but you look at the bullets in context (given that we've had this massive discussion on 1 out of 8 bullet points), it adds a lot, and we're just trying to clear up that "it is testable". Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Friday, 8 March 2019 09:54:55 UTC