W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > February 2019

Minutes of Silver meeting 26 February 2019

From: Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:07:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGQw2hmWK+_ERO_D+zk-K-EJDqZ+vy88msQXm4fFW9E3s=YSvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
Formatted minutes <https://www.w3.org/2019/02/26-silver-minutes.html>

Text of minutes:
   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                 Silver Community Group Teleconference

26 Feb 2019

Attendees

   Present
          Lauriat, kirkwood, KimD, CharlesHall, JF, Cyborg,
          jeanne, bruce_bailey

   Regrets

   Chair
          SV_MEETING_CHAIR

   Scribe
          Lauriat

Contents

     * [2]Topics
         1. [3]CSUN planning
         2. [4]Requirements updates and polish for AG WG re-review
     * [5]Summary of Action Items
     * [6]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

CSUN planning

   <CharlesHall> please also share any webex / meeting share
   information as well

   [7]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/2019_CSUN_
   F2F_Meeting

      [7]
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/2019_CSUN_F2F_Meeting

   <CharlesHall> prior to that meeting, my 2 cents: wc = web
   content, which is the part that needs to change. ag =
   accessibility guidelines, which seems perfectly valid to keep.

   <Cyborg> EO = ?

   <Cyborg> education?...?

   <CharlesHall> Education and Outreach group

   <CharlesHall> I see Shawn

   <jeanne> [8]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Meetings/CSUN_2019

      [8] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Meetings/CSUN_2019

   <CharlesHall> I am not allowed to Register

   * Requirements document done (joint session Monday am?)

   * Brainstorming exercise for a permanent name for Silver

   * Working session/training session for content creation (with
   EO)

   Tuesday: * Strategy and prioritization of content creation

   <scribe> * New AG WG charter (joint Tuesday pm?)

   * Review latest editor's draft with AGWG (joint session)?

Requirements updates and polish for AG WG re-review

   [9]https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/index.html

      [9] https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/index.html

   <KimD> 3.6: Regulatory and interpretive support

   <KimD> The Guidelines provide broad support, including

   <KimD> • structure and content that facilitates adoption into
   law, regulation, or policy, and

   <KimD> • clear intent as to purpose and goals, to assist when
   there ARE QUESTIONS OR controversy

   The Guidelines support the regulatory environment with clarity
   and transparency of intent. Guidelines can be used in
   developing regulation and resolving litigation.

   <kirkwood> +1

   <KimD> second bullet: clear intent and transparency as to
   purpose and goals, to assist when there are questions or
   controvery

   <kirkwood> +1

   <jeanne> +1

   <Cyborg> that was a helpful discussion +1

   <JF> +1

   +1

   <bruce_bailey> +1

   <CharlesHall> +1

   <KimD> +1

   <kirkwood> John Foliot is v smart ;)

   <bruce_bailey> Just noting that I appreciated John K's
   explaination that in court setting (1) having a standard, and
   (2) demonstration that other sites are meeting the standard --
   does away with with assertions about accessiblity being an
   undue burden.

   <Cyborg> suggested language for an additional requirement? -
   The guidelines strive to recognize that people with
   disabilities have individual needs and are important
   contributors to accessibility.

   <Cyborg> individual needs and intersectional identities

   <Cyborg> Rewrite: The guidelines strive to recognize that
   people with disabilities have individual and intersectional
   needs and are important contriutors to accessibility.

   <Cyborg> opens door to customization and meaningful involvement

   Design principle: The creation process for the guidelines
   should: recognize that people with disabilities have individual
   and intersectional needs and are important contributors to
   accessibility.

   <KimD> Could we add it to #6 under § 2. Design Principles?

   <Cyborg> original was "contributors in path toward
   accessibility"

   Design principle: The creation process for the guidelines
   should: Include people with disabilities and recognize that
   people with disabilities have individual and intersectional
   needs.

   <KimD> Include people with disabilities because they have
   individual and intersectional needs and are important
   contributors.

   <JF> The creation process for the guidelines should recognize
   that people with disabilities have individual and
   intersectional needs and are important contributors to
   accessibility standards and solutions.

   <CharlesHall> so the intent is participation is more important
   than consideration

   <CharlesHall> +1 to JF wording

   <Cyborg> +1 to JF

   <kirkwood> +1

   <KimD> +1 to JF's

   <bruce_bailey> +1

   <jeanne> +1 to JF

   The creation process for the guidelines should: Include people
   with disabilities and recognize that people with disabilities
   have individual and intersectional needs and are important
   contributors to accessibility standards and solutions.

   <Cyborg> are those two things?

   trackbot, make minutes

   <trackbot> Sorry, Lauriat, I don't understand 'trackbot, make
   minutes'. Please refer to
   <[10]http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc> for help.

     [10] http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc

   <Cyborg> Include pwd and recognize that pwd are important
   contributors to accessibility standards and solutions
   (meaningful involvement). Recognize that pwd have individual
   and intersectional needs (customization)

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2019 16:07:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:44 UTC