Summary and Minutes of Silver Conformance meeting of 17 December 2019

== Summary ==

We received an update on the Challenges document moving through the AGWG 
approval process.  AGWG members replied to the survey accepting the 
document for a FPWD this week. There were a number of comments, and the 
document will go back for updates and another survey in January.

We worked more on the Sampling proposal 
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y_HOyuMKltOQoZr0Gk7hMQXi3Jd8Mc5fyr-XkH7kZQY/edit#heading=h.j07liyrhk7zr>.  
We discussed whether we should have component testing, flow testing or 
both.  We want to be able to provide all three options so that 
organizations can evaluate their site in the way that works for them.  
For example, a company wanting to evaluate their website could declare 
the major workflows that a user could encounter. Silver conformance 
section would tell them how to select workflows and a high level of how 
to test workflows.  Within the workflow, there would be components that 
would need to be tested, like navigation and footer, that would also 
have to be accessible as part of the workflow.

We discussed how VPAT would fit into the Silver conformance. Once the 
Silver conformance model gets a little more solid, we want to involve 
ITI so that the VPAT associated with Silver would reflect the Silver 
conformance model.  For example, a Silver VPAT could start with an 
organization (company) listing the primary workflows tested.  This is 
hypothetical, and no contact has yet been made with ITI.

== Minutes ==

https://www.w3.org/2019/12/17-silver-conf-minutes.html