Minutes of the Silver meeting of 9 October 2018

Better late than never.

https://www.w3.org/2018/10/09-silver-minutes.html

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                  Silver Community Group Teleconference

09 Oct 2018

Attendees

    Present
           Lauriat, KimD, mikeCrabb, kirkwood

    Regrets

    Chair
           Shawn, jeanne

    Scribe
           jeanne

Contents

      * [2]Topics
          1. [3]TPAC meeting & presentation plans
          2. [4]Plain language prototype
          3. [5]Conformance update
          4. [6]Information architecture update prototype
      * [7]Summary of Action Items
      * [8]Summary of Resolutions
      __________________________________________________________

    <Lauriat>
    [9]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/TPAC_2018_
    Agenda

       [9] 
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/TPAC_2018_Agenda

TPAC meeting & presentation plans

    [reviewing the agenda and discussion of the AGWG activity]

    <scribe> scribe: jeanne

    The ideas are starting to come toward giving AGWG the style
    guide and ask them to re-write existing success criteria in
    plain language with tagging .

    CHarles: We could divide the WG into small groups -- some with
    existing success criteria, and some with SC that didn't make it
    into WCAG 2.1 (as a stress test)

    Cybele: Would this be a valid test, because some people
    objected to them.

    Shawn: We could do a totally fake test -- like, "every page has
    to have a picture of a dog" so we can have them focus on the
    process.

    Charles: The challenge is time. The participant will be focused
    on imagining the scenario, instead of writing it simply.

    Shawn: I want to test the maintainability of it. FOr plain
    language, I want to test the Style Guide.

    Two groups: one to work on Information Architecture
    (maintainability) and one to work on Plain Language (convert
    existing content).

    Charles: It would be research, not usability testing. This is
    not statistically valid confirmation of something, yes or no.

    Shawn: But we could take the results and turn it into an
    Editor's Draft. It would need more work because we don't have a
    solid conformance model yet.
    ... This exercise takes advantage of their expertise without
    them having to be on Silver calls.

    <mikeCrabb>
    [10]https://w3c.github.io/silver/prototypes/FlavorPrototype/sit
    e/1-1-1/index.html

      [10] 
https://w3c.github.io/silver/prototypes/FlavorPrototype/site/1-1-1/index.html

    Charles: Do a card-sorting exersize to determine tags we hadn't
    considered.

    [discussion of a card sorting exersize]

    Charles: If that is a stretch, then we probably shouldn't do
    it.

    <mikeCrabb>
    [11]https://rawgit.com/w3c/silver/newPlainLanguage/prototypes/P
    lainLanguage2/index.html#section1

      [11] 
https://rawgit.com/w3c/silver/newPlainLanguage/prototypes/PlainLanguage2/index.html#section1

    Jeanne: We could run three groups and have the 3 people there
    lead each one.

Plain language prototype

    Mike Crabb did a working prototype of the plain language tabs.

    <mikeCrabb>
    [12]https://mikecrabb.github.io/silver_taggingSystemDemo/guidel
    ines.html

      [12] 
https://mikecrabb.github.io/silver_taggingSystemDemo/guidelines.html

    <mikeCrabb> [13]https://github.com/mikecrabb/silverTaggingAPI

      [13] https://github.com/mikecrabb/silverTaggingAPI

    Cyborg: I commented on the plain language prototype. My chief
    concerns were including a tab for Usability Testing or
    Person-centered testing and whether there is consideration of
    product-wide guidance. This seems to be focused on component
    level guidance.

    <mikeCrabb>
    [14]https://silvertagapi.azurewebsites.net/api/categories

      [14] https://silvertagapi.azurewebsites.net/api/categories

    Jeanne: Mike, is there any update on on Information
    ARchitecture

    <mikeCrabb>
    [15]https://silvertagapi.azurewebsites.net/api/categoryTags/3

      [15] https://silvertagapi.azurewebsites.net/api/categoryTags/3

    There is no front end interface yet, but there are queries that
    are working. I should have a front end working by Tuesday.

Conformance update

Information architecture update prototype

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

    [End of minutes]

Received on Friday, 12 October 2018 13:43:56 UTC