- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:40:13 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Forwarded from Cyborg: Thanks so much, Michael, for doing this. The only thing that was supposed to change since then was to maybe add a second Design tab for the Usability Testing or Person-Centered Testing. This is because the visual design activities and the co-design and usability testing activities often get lumped together, which can be problematic, as they are sometimes best led by two different groups. We never came up with a great heading for it. There are some usability testing questions currently under design that could move to that new tab. What's tricky about naming this new tab is that what you do depends whether you're talking about component, task-based or overall guidance and methods. If you're implementing a component-based guidance, you would probably call this Usability Testing. Same with Task-Based Guidance. But if you're looking, for example, at Overall Project or Product level guidance like: Meaningful Involvement or an Accessibility Statement or Data Protections, this may involve more co-design rather than just testing with people after you've built it. Anyway, because we hadn't figured that out yet, I didn't add it. But I think it would be a good idea to try to run a few Task-Based and Overall Project/Product Guidance and Methods through our plain language prototype to make sure the same tabs and headings match. Probably can't do that before France, but shouldn't be forgotten. In the Get Started tab, there was also discussion about maybe adding a heading called: How the POUR Principles apply. But I'm not sure that was decided yet. Thoughts?
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2018 14:40:36 UTC