- From: Mark Tanner <levelpress@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 09:03:56 +0000
- To: public-silver@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+j1zdRRMLF+3YBxVk1L-7PCJ1_oOY-vcKU-4YOCv1kKDCxMSQ@mail.gmail.com>
This is further to comments I made last week about how tags were and weren't used in the prototype. I wanted to add a further point, which I didn't emphasise enough, about the potential problem with a purely "flat" architecture in general. Currently, if I haven't completely misunderstood things, it seems the suggestion is that the guidelines will be presented without any overarching structure or organisation. There would simply be a list of 78 guidelines as the default view. Many different people need to get an understanding of the guidelines in their entirety, and some kind of presentational organising categories for a default view of all the guidelines really helps that.Without them you simply have a long list. This doesn't mean these categories have to any normative role, they would simply act act as organisational devices to make the material more easily understandable. If there isn't any structure, what is the intended default view of all the guidelines? (The same goes for methods) Mark Tanner
Received on Sunday, 25 November 2018 09:04:30 UTC