When reviewing the open issues for 2.1 on 03/20 (while Silver was hosting the Design Sprint), the Working Group had a discussion on issue #805 – citing #Silver several times.
One of the topics is ensuring decisions captured in 2.1 (and presumably 2.2) are included in planning for Silver – such as finalizing terminology and usage like ‘inactive’ versus ‘disabled’.
Minutes: https://www.w3.org/2018/03/20-ag-minutes.html#resolution02
Issue: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/805
The Silver CG should start tracking some of these issues for visibility and discussion – especially those described as “Action 1: Defer to Silver”, in this case, by Glenda Sims (from Deque).
Cheers,
Charles Hall
UX Architect, Technology
t / 248.203.8723 m / 248.225.8179
e / charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com
skype / charles.h.all
360 W Maple, Birmingham MI 48009
w / www.mrm-mccann.com
[id:5D510C5C-1CCD-479C-A466-98D1FC580B9B]
Creativity. Technology. Performance.
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy, disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message. Thank you very much.
